What are Microservices
Microservices architecture is a design approach that builds applications as a collection of small, independent services. Each service has a single responsibility and can be deployed and scaled independently.
Large-scale web services like Netflix, Amazon, and Uber have adopted this architecture.
Difference from Monolith: In monolithic architecture, all functionality is contained in a single application. In microservices, functionality is divided into separate services.
From Monolith to Microservices
flowchart TB
subgraph Monolith["Monolithic Architecture"]
subgraph SingleApp["Single Application"]
Auth1["Auth"]
Product1["Product"]
Order1["Order"]
Payment1["Payment"]
end
SharedDB["Shared Database"]
SingleApp --> SharedDB
end
flowchart TB
subgraph Micro["Microservices Architecture"]
subgraph AS["Auth Service"]
Auth2["Auth"] --> DB1["DB"]
end
subgraph PS["Product Service"]
Product2["Product"] --> DB2["DB"]
end
subgraph OS["Order Service"]
Order2["Order"] --> DB3["DB"]
end
subgraph PaS["Payment Service"]
Payment2["Payment"] --> DB4["DB"]
end
end
Microservices Design Principles
1. Single Responsibility Principle
Each service specializes in one business function.
| Good Examples | Bad Example |
|---|---|
| Auth Service: Login, token management | User Service: Auth + Profile + Notifications + Settings → Too many responsibilities |
| Product Service: Product info, inventory management | |
| Order Service: Order processing, history management |
2. Autonomy
Services should be deployable and operable independently without depending on other services.
3. Distributed Data Management
Each service owns its data and doesn’t directly access other services’ databases.
4. Fault Isolation
Design so that failure of one service doesn’t cascade to the entire system.
Service Communication Patterns
Synchronous Communication (REST/gRPC)
flowchart LR
Client --> Gateway["API Gateway"] --> A["Service A"] --> B["Service B"]
Service A waits for response from Service B
- REST API: Simple, HTTP-based
- gRPC: Efficient communication via Protocol Buffers
Asynchronous Communication (Message Queue)
flowchart LR
A["Service A"] --> MQ["Message Queue<br/>(RabbitMQ, Kafka)"] --> B["Service B"]
Responds immediately, processes later
- Event-driven: Achieves loose coupling between services
- Reliability: Message persistence and redelivery
Approaches to Service Decomposition
Domain-Driven Design (DDD)
Divide services by Bounded Contexts.
E-commerce example:
| Product Context | Order Context | Customer Context | Payment Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Order | Customer | Payment |
| Category | Order Item | Address | Billing |
| Inventory | Shipping |
Decomposition Criteria
| Criteria | Description |
|---|---|
| Business boundaries | Separate different business domains |
| Change frequency | Isolate frequently changing parts |
| Scale requirements | Isolate high-load functions |
| Team structure | Divide by team responsibility |
Microservices Challenges and Solutions
Distributed System Complexity
| Challenge | Solution |
|---|---|
| Network failures | Circuit breaker, retries |
| Data consistency | Saga pattern, event sourcing |
| Service discovery | Service discovery (Consul, Eureka) |
| Monitoring difficulty | Distributed tracing (Jaeger, Zipkin) |
Circuit Breaker Pattern
| State | Flow | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Normal | Client → Service A → Service B | Normal response |
| Failure (circuit open) | Client → Service A ✕ Service B (failed) | Fallback response (cached or default value) |
When to Choose Microservices
Suitable cases
- Large teams wanting parallel development
- Need for different tech stacks per service
- Need to scale specific features independently
- Domains that can be clearly separated
Not suitable cases
- Small-scale applications
- Small teams (5 or fewer people)
- Insufficient domain knowledge
- Immature operations infrastructure
Monolith First: Starting with a monolith and breaking into microservices as you grow is often the recommended approach.
Summary
Microservices is a powerful architectural pattern for managing complexity in large-scale systems. However, it comes with distributed system-specific challenges. It’s important to consider team size, business complexity, and operational capabilities when choosing the appropriate architecture.
← Back to list